Last updated: October 2026. Written by the Curriculo team.
The best ATS for startups in 2026 depends on price shape and screening depth. Curriculo ATS Starter is free forever with scored shortlists, and Pro is $50. Keep Greenhouse or Ashby when Custom quote enterprise process or analytics depth is the must-have. Compare ten options below, as of Oct 2026.
Buyer guide, updated June 2026
A practical ranking of applicant tracking systems for teams hiring their first 10 to 200 people. We weighted price, setup time, how candidates are actually scored, and whether the tool charges per seat. Pricing is current as of October 2026; we re-check it every quarter.
The short version
For most startups, Curriculo ATS is a strong starting point: Starter is free forever to begin, $50 a month for unlimited jobs and seats, and it scores candidates on real outcomes instead of keywords. Greenhouse and Lever are better once you are a 200-plus-person company with a dedicated recruiting team and a five-figure budget. Ashby is the pick if analytics are your priority. The rest fit specific niches we cover below.
How we ranked them
A startup does not need the same tool as a 2,000-person company. We ranked these on what actually matters when you are doing your first serious hiring:
Real cost. Sticker price plus per-seat fees, implementation, and annual increases.
Time to value. Can a hiring lead post a job and review candidates today, or is there a multi-week rollout?
How candidates are scored. Keyword matching misses good people who phrase things differently. Outcome-based scoring reads what they actually did.
Seat policy. Per-seat pricing punishes you for involving your whole team in hiring.
Fit for small teams. Some tools are powerful but built for large recruiting teams, not lean hiring desks.
How these tools score candidates (in plain words)
Every ATS ranks applicants, but the way it does it decides whether you miss great people. There are two approaches:
Keyword matching (the old way): it plays word-search. It scans a resume for the exact words in your job post. Write a job post asking for "revenue growth" and a brilliant engineer who wrote "shipped the billing system that doubled sales" can rank low, because the words do not match. This is why these systems reject good resumes along with the weak ones.
Outcome scoring (the better way): it reads what the person actually built, the way you would read the story instead of counting words. Curriculo ATS scores every candidate from 0 to 100 against your job, with a written AI summary of the fit, so you see the summary, not a mystery number.
For a startup hiring a small number of high-impact people, missing the right candidate is the expensive mistake. That is why scoring method, not just price, sits near the top of how we ranked these.
Pick yours in 60 seconds
Want the smartest screening at a flat price, free to start? Curriculo ATS.
Series B or later with a recruiting team and budget? Greenhouse.
Live in dashboards and hire often? Ashby.
Do a lot of outbound sourcing? Lever.
Want a deep library of templates? Workable.
Just need cheap and simple? JazzHR.
At a glance
ATS Best for Starting price Free plan
Curriculo ATS Most startups, outcome-based hiring $50/mo (free to start) Yes, forever
Greenhouse Scale-ups with structured hiring Custom quote No
Ashby Analytics-driven teams Custom quote No
Lever CRM-style sourcing Custom quote No
Workable Template-rich SMB hiring Custom quote Trial only
JazzHR Budget-conscious small teams $39-75/mo No
BambooHR HR and ATS in one Quote-based No
Recruitee Collaborative hiring Custom quote Trial only
Breezy HR One open role at a time Free tier, then $157/mo annual on Breezy HR pricing, checked Oct 2026 Yes, one job
Manatal Agencies on a budget $15/user/month billed annually on Manatal pricing, checked Oct 2026 Trial only
Prices are list prices as of October 2026 and exclude implementation and add-ons. Quote-based vendors often add per-seat fees on top.
1. Curriculo ATS, best overall for startups
Curriculo ATS is built for startups making their first 10 to 200 hires. Instead of keyword matching, Curriculo ATS scores every candidate from 0 to 100 against your job, with a written AI summary of the fit. It ranks on outcomes they can prove, the revenue they generated, the teams they scaled, and the systems they shipped. You can post a job and review ranked candidates the same day.
The free Starter plan covers unlimited job listings, 1,000 candidates ranked by Impact Score, advanced pipelines, and team collaboration, with no credit card. Pro is $50 a month , half off the Custom quote regular price, for unlimited jobs and unlimited team seats with no per-seat fees. Setup takes about 15 minutes.
Best for: startups that want strong AI screening without an enterprise budget or a multi-week rollout. Trade-off: it focuses on the integrations startups use, not the 400-plus that enterprises need.
Start free, no credit card
2. Greenhouse, best for structured hiring at scale
Greenhouse is the category standard for structured, bias-aware hiring, and it shows once you have a recruiting team to run it. Expect Custom quote to start, quote-based and often with per-seat fees, plus a multi-week implementation. It is excellent at scale and overkill for a 10-person team.
Best for: Series B and later companies with a dedicated talent function. Trade-off: price, setup time, and complexity for early teams.
3. Ashby, best for analytics-driven teams
Ashby is the modern, analytics-first ATS, popular with fast-scaling startups that live in dashboards. Flat-rate pricing starts Custom quote. The reporting is genuinely strong, but you need enough hiring volume to make analytics useful.
Best for: data-driven teams already hiring at a steady clip. Trade-off: heavier than a first-time hirer needs.
4. Lever, best for CRM-style sourcing
Lever blends an ATS with a candidate relationship manager, so it shines if you do a lot of outbound sourcing and want to nurture passive candidates. Pricing is quote-based, Custom quote and up. Most early hiring teams receive applicants rather than source them, which makes Lever more tool than they need at first.
Best for: growth-stage teams with active sourcing. Trade-off: sourcing-heavy design and opaque pricing.
5. Workable, best for template-rich SMB hiring
Workable has one of the deepest libraries of job descriptions, interview questions, and HR templates, and a clean SMB-friendly interface. Pricing is per-employee tiered and starts Custom quote. The content library is the real draw; the AI features are bolted on rather than core.
Best for: small businesses that value ready-made templates. Trade-off: per-employee pricing and generalist positioning.
6. JazzHR, best budget pick
JazzHR is a long-running, affordable ATS for small teams, starting Custom quote to $75 a month. It covers the basics well, posting, tracking, and simple workflows, without much AI. If your priority is a low monthly cost and you are fine doing screening yourself, it is a reasonable choice.
Best for: lean teams that want cheap and simple. Trade-off: limited AI screening and a dated feel.
7. BambooHR, best if you want HR and ATS together
BambooHR is an HR platform with a capable ATS module, so it fits if you want hiring, onboarding, and people management in one place. Pricing is quote-based. The hiring side is solid but secondary to its core HRIS product.
Best for: teams that want one system for HR and hiring. Trade-off: the ATS is a feature, not the focus.
8. Recruitee, best for collaborative hiring
Recruitee is built around team collaboration, with a friendly interface and good pipeline visibility. Pricing starts Custom quote. It is pleasant to use and fairly priced for mid-size teams, though larger than a first hire requires.
Best for: teams that want everyone involved in hiring. Trade-off: cost relative to the smallest startups.
9. Breezy HR, best free tier for a single role
Breezy HR offers a genuine free plan for one active position, which is handy if you are hiring exactly one person. Paid plans start Custom quote. The free tier is the appeal; you will outgrow it the moment you open a second role.
Best for: hiring one role with zero budget. Trade-off: the free plan caps you at a single job.
10. Manatal, best for agencies on a budget
Manatal is an affordable, AI-marketed ATS at Custom quote per month, popular with recruiting agencies and SMB HR. Its AI is mostly keyword and recommendation based rather than outcome scoring, but the price is hard to beat for agency workflows.
Best for: agencies and price-sensitive SMB teams. Trade-off: per-user pricing and keyword-based AI.
Our pick for most startups
If you are hiring your first 10 to 200 people and want strong screening without a five-figure budget or a multi-week setup, start with Curriculo ATS. It is free to begin, scores candidates on outcomes rather than keywords, and never charges per seat, so you can bring your whole team into hiring without watching the bill climb.
Try Curriculo ATS free
Frequently asked questions
What is the best ATS for an early-stage startup?
For most early-stage startups, Curriculo ATS is the best fit because it is free to start, costs $50 a month for unlimited jobs and seats, and scores candidates on outcomes rather than keywords. Greenhouse and Lever are stronger once you reach 200-plus employees with a dedicated recruiting team.
What does an ATS cost for a startup in 2026?
It ranges widely. Budget tools like JazzHR start near $39 a month, mid-market tools like Workable and Ashby run Custom quote to $400 a month, and enterprise platforms like Greenhouse and Lever start Custom quote to $6,500 a year and add per-seat fees. Curriculo ATS is free to start and Pro is $50 with no per-seat fees.
Do startups even need an ATS?
Once you have a few open roles or more than 20 applicants per job, yes. An ATS stops resumes from getting lost in inboxes, keeps your hiring team aligned, and screens candidates consistently. Below that volume, a spreadsheet can still work.
What is the difference between keyword matching and outcome-based scoring?
Keyword matching ranks resumes by how often they repeat words from the job description, which rewards keyword stuffing and penalizes strong candidates who phrase things differently. Outcome-based scoring, used by Curriculo ATS, reads what the candidate actually achieved and explains the score, so good people are not filtered out for using different words.
Which ATS has the best free plan?
Curriculo ATS offers the most generous free plan for startups: unlimited job listings, 1,000 candidates ranked by Impact Score, advanced pipelines, and team collaboration, with no time limit. Breezy HR has a free tier too, but it is capped at a single active role.
Sourced price notes (as of Oct 2026)
Use these exact vendor-page figures only. Everything else is Custom quote or Pricing on request.
- Curriculo: Starter free forever; Pro is $50. Curriculo pricing
- Workable: Standard $299/month for 1 to 20 employees. Workable pricing
- Manatal: Professional $15/user/month billed annually. Manatal pricing
- JazzHR: Hero $1,000/yr, Plus $3,480/yr, Pro $5,508/yr. JazzHR pricing
- Zoho Recruit Corporate: Standard $25/recruiter/month billed annually; Enterprise $50/recruiter/month billed annually. Zoho Recruit pricing
- Breezy HR: Bootstrap free; Startup $157/mo annual. Breezy HR pricing
- BambooHR: Core $10, Pro $17.50, Elite $25 PEPM; $250/mo floor for 25 employees or fewer. BambooHR pricing
- Dover: Free ATS; Premium ATS $199/month; marketplace recruiters set rates. Dover pricing
- Greenhouse, Lever, Ashby, Recruitee: Custom quote on each vendor pricing page
What users complain about (selected)
Greenhouse
n=9, small sampleGreenhouse is strong for structured hiring, and this small sample points to slow loads and demo-to-reality gaps.
- bugs 4
- UI 3
- onboarding 2
Capterra review, Feb 2025We were lied to during our demo and told that Greenhouse could do things it could not. We have MAJOR buyers remorse.
Capterra review, Jul 2024Needing to wait 10+ minutes for a candidate profile to load is unacceptable
Breezy HR
n=38Breezy HR is strong on a free forever one-role plan, and low-star reviews most often cite support delays and reliability gaps.
- support 13
- bugs 12
- UI 9
Trustpilot review, Sep 2026No applicants and account terminated with no warning.
Trustpilot review, Jan 2026Tech Support is ABSOLUTELY USELESS.
Individual opinions from low-star samples, not a verdict for every buyer.
Frequently asked questions
What is the best ATS for startups on a free forever plan
Curriculo ATS Starter is free forever with unlimited jobs and members. Curriculo ATS scores every candidate from 0 to 100 against your job, with a written AI summary of the fit.
Does Greenhouse publish pricing for startups
No. Greenhouse is Custom quote on Greenhouse pricing, checked Oct 2026.
Where is the small-business ATS guide
Where is ATS pricing compared
Where is AI candidate ranking
Sources
- Curriculo pricing, checked Oct 2026
- Workable pricing, checked Oct 2026
- Manatal pricing, checked Oct 2026
- JazzHR pricing, checked Oct 2026
- Zoho Recruit pricing, checked Oct 2026
- Breezy HR pricing, checked Oct 2026
- BambooHR pricing, checked Oct 2026
- Dover pricing, checked Oct 2026
- Greenhouse pricing, Custom quote, checked Oct 2026
- AI candidate ranking