Last updated: October 2026. Written by the Curriculo team.
The best Greenhouse alternative for most startups is Curriculo ATS: free forever Starter, or Pro is $50 with no per-seat fees. Greenhouse publishes Custom quote pricing. Compare free plans, AI screening, and setup time across 20 alternatives below, as of Oct 2026.
ATS Guide · Greenhouse pricing checked October 2, 2026
What is the best Greenhouse alternative for startups? For most early-stage teams, Curriculo ATS: free Starter, or Pro is $50 Pro with no per-seat fees. Greenhouse does not publish prices. Vendr lists a median contract of $26,611 per year (Vendr, checked October 2, 2026). Compare free plans and setup time below.
Other vendor prices on this page were reviewed for this page in October 2026 and may have changed; check each vendor before you buy. For free plans checked October 2, 2026, see the best free ATS guide. Switching? Read the Greenhouse migration guide.
The Cost Math
Greenhouse vs Curriculo: Real Annual Cost
Greenhouse does not publish its prices. Vendr, which negotiates software contracts, reports that the median buyer pays $26,611 per year for Greenhouse (Vendr, as of October 2, 2026); quotes depend on employee count and expected hiring volume. Curriculo's prices are public.
Cost Greenhouse Curriculo ATS
Published price No, quote only Yes
Typical annual cost $26,611 median (Vendr, Oct 2, 2026) $0 on Starter, or Pro is $50
How it is priced Quoted by employee count and hiring volume Flat; Starter has unlimited team members and no per-seat fees
The short version: Greenhouse's median contract is $26,611 a year (Vendr, October 2, 2026), while Curriculo costs $0 on Starter or Pro is $50.
At a Glance
Top 10 Greenhouse Alternatives
A quick comparison of the most popular Greenhouse alternatives for startups and SMBs.
| ATS | Best for | Starting price | Free plan | AI screening | Key strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Curriculo ATS | Recruiters and small teams | Free Starter; Pro is $50 | Yes, unlimited jobs | Impact Score 0 to 100 | Scored shortlists + Candidate Network |
| Ashby | Analytics-first teams | Custom quote | No | Automation plus screening | Native analytics |
| Lever | CRM-style recruiting | Custom quote | No | Custom quote for AI features | CRM nurture |
| Workable | SMB sourcing breadth | $299/month Standard (1 to 20 employees) | No | AI sourcing | Board distribution |
| Manatal | Agencies | $15/user/month billed annually | No | AI matching | Board volume |
| JazzHR | Small business | Hero $1,000/yr | No | Matching on higher tiers | Flat annual plans |
| Zoho Recruit | Zoho suite users | $25/recruiter/month billed annually | Limited free | Higher-tier AI | Zoho ecosystem |
| BambooHR | HRIS-first SMBs | Core $10 PEPM | No | Basic hiring module | Full HR suite |
| Breezy HR | Visual pipeline teams | Bootstrap free; Startup $157/mo annual | Yes, 1 active role | Add-on credits | Kanban + video |
| Recruitee | Collaborative hiring | Custom quote | No | Custom quote | Collaboration polish |
All 20 Greenhouse Alternatives Reviewed
Each platform evaluated on pricing, AI capabilities, setup time, and startup fit.
#1 Curriculo ATS, Best Overall for Startups
Curriculo ATS is an AI-native applicant tracking system built specifically for startups with 5 to 200 employees. Curriculo ATS scores every candidate from 0 to 100 against your job, with a written AI summary of the fit.
The standout feature is the built-in Candidate Network of 10,000+ professionals whose resumes are pre-structured through the Curriculo resume builder, providing cleaner data for AI screening. Starter is free forever with unlimited jobs and members. Pro is $50 with no per-seat fees. Greenhouse is Custom quote on Greenhouse pricing, checked Oct 2026. Vendr lists a median contract of $26,611 per year as third-party context only (Vendr Greenhouse marketplace, checked Oct 2, 2026).
- Pricing: Starter free forever; Pro is $50. No per-seat fees. See Curriculo pricing, checked Oct 2026
- Best for: Recruiters and small teams that want scored shortlists without a Custom quote
- Key feature: 0 to 100 Impact Score with a written AI summary of the fit, plus Candidate Network access to 10,000+ pre-structured profiles
- Limitation: Fewer enterprise integrations than a full hiring OS
- Compare: Curriculo pricing
#2 Ashby, Best for Data-Driven Startups
Ashby has quickly become the analytics-first ATS that data-driven startups gravitate toward. Its modern UI feels like it was designed by a product team rather than an HR vendor, and its reporting capabilities are genuinely best-in-class, you get pipeline velocity, source ROI, and diversity metrics out of the box without needing to upgrade to a higher tier.
The trade-off is price. At Custom quote, Ashby sits in an awkward middle ground, too expensive for seed-stage startups but significantly cheaper than Greenhouse. It works best for Series A/B companies with 20 to 500 employees that have moved past spreadsheet recruiting but don't need enterprise tooling.
- Pricing: Custom quote on Ashby, checked Oct 2026
- Best for: Data-driven startups and scale-ups that want analytics-first ATS
- Key feature: Best-in-class recruitment analytics
- Limitation: No free forever plan; Custom quote sales cycle
- Compare: Ashby comparison
#3 Lever, Best CRM + ATS Hybrid
Lever (now part of Employ Inc.) combines a full CRM with its ATS, making it the strongest option for companies that rely on candidate nurture campaigns and long-term relationship building. If your hiring strategy involves sourcing passive candidates and keeping them warm over months, Lever's nurture sequences and automated touchpoints are hard to beat.
Lever also offers solid DEI analytics and structured interview tools that mirror some of Greenhouse's core strengths. Starting at Custom quote, it's cheaper than Greenhouse but still aimed at mid-market companies with 100 to 500 employees. No free plan is available.
- Pricing: Custom quote on Lever pricing, checked Oct 2026
- Best for: Mid-market teams that want ATS plus CRM-style nurturing
- Key feature: CRM nurture campaigns and DEI tools
- Limitation: No free forever plan; longer mid-market rollout
- Compare: Lever comparison
#4 Workable, Best for AI-Powered Sourcing
Workable's headline feature is its AI sourcing engine backed by a database of over 200 million candidate profiles. When you post a job, Workable can automatically surface relevant candidates from its database, essentially giving you a sourcing tool and ATS in one. For companies that struggle to attract inbound applicants, this is a genuine differentiator.
At $149/month and up, Workable targets SMBs with 10 to 1,000 employees. The interface is clean and well-designed, and the platform includes video interviews, offer management, and onboarding features. The main downside: no free plan, only a 15-day trial, and AI sourcing quality varies by role type and geography.
- Pricing: Standard starts at $299/month for 1 to 20 employees on Workable pricing, checked Oct 2026
- Best for: SMB to mid-market teams that want AI sourcing breadth
- Key feature: Wide job-board distribution and AI sourcing suite
- Limitation: No free forever plan; higher employee bands cost more
- Compare: Workable comparison
#5 Manatal, Best for Agencies & Multi-Board Posting
Manatal is an AI-powered ATS that excels at multi-channel job distribution, connecting to over 2,500 job boards worldwide. Its AI candidate matching scores applicants automatically and enriches profiles with data from LinkedIn and social media. At $15/user/month, it's one of the most affordable options with genuine AI capabilities.
Manatal is particularly popular with recruitment agencies thanks to its client management features and white-label career pages. For in-house teams, it works well for SMBs that post across many channels and need a centralized pipeline. The per-user pricing model can get expensive as your team grows, though.
- Pricing: $15/user/month billed annually on Manatal pricing, checked Oct 2026
- Best for: Agencies and SMBs that want per-user pricing and board volume
- Key feature: Broad job-board posting and AI matching
- Limitation: Per-user bills climb with headcount; no free forever plan
- Compare: Manatal comparison
#6 JazzHR, Best Budget ATS for Small Business
JazzHR is the no-frills ATS that small businesses under 50 employees reach for when they outgrow spreadsheets but don't want to overpay. At $75/month, it provides job posting, candidate tracking, interview scheduling, and basic reporting. Higher-tier plans unlock unlimited active jobs.
The platform won't impress anyone with its design or AI capabilities, it's basic, functional, and affordable. That's the point. JazzHR works for businesses that need structure around their hiring process without the complexity (or cost) of platforms like Greenhouse.
- Pricing: Hero $1,000/yr, Plus $3,480/yr, Pro $5,508/yr on JazzHR pricing, checked Oct 2026
- Best for: Small businesses that want flat annual pricing
- Key feature: Transparent flat-fee annual plans
- Limitation: Hero starts at 3 active jobs a month; no free forever plan
- Compare: JazzHR comparison
#7 Zoho Recruit, Best for Zoho Ecosystem Users
Zoho Recruit offers a free plan with 1 active job posting, making it one of the few genuinely free ATS options. If your company already uses Zoho CRM, Zoho People, or other Zoho apps, Recruit integrates seamlessly into that ecosystem, sharing data across HR, sales, and operations without third-party connectors.
The free plan is genuinely limited (1 active job, basic features), but paid plans starting at $25/user/month are competitive. Zoho Recruit won't match Greenhouse in depth, but it's a solid choice for SMBs already invested in the Zoho stack.
- Pricing: Corporate Standard $25/recruiter/month billed annually on Zoho Recruit pricing, checked Oct 2026
- Best for: Teams already in the Zoho suite
- Key feature: Native Zoho ecosystem fit
- Limitation: Free plan is limited; priced per recruiter
- Compare: Zoho Recruit comparison
#8 BambooHR, Best All-in-One HR + ATS
BambooHR is primarily an HR platform (payroll, benefits, time-off, employee records) with an ATS module built in. If you need both HR management and applicant tracking in a single tool, BambooHR eliminates the need to manage two separate systems. HR plan prices are listed on BambooHR pricing, checked Oct 2026 (Core $10, Pro $17.50, Elite $25 per employee per month, with a $250/mo floor for 25 employees or fewer).
The ATS component is functional but not its primary strength. You get job posting, application tracking, and basic hiring workflows. If hiring is your top priority and you need advanced screening or analytics, a dedicated ATS like Curriculo ATS or Ashby will serve you better. BambooHR is best when hiring is one of many HR needs.
- Pricing: Core $10, Pro $17.50, Elite $25 per employee per month, with a $250/mo floor for 25 employees or fewer, on BambooHR pricing, checked Oct 2026
- Best for: SMBs that need HRIS first and ATS second
- Key feature: Full HR suite with a built-in hiring module
- Limitation: ATS is secondary; not a screening-first product
- Compare: BambooHR alternatives
#9 Breezy HR, Best Free Visual Pipeline
Breezy HR offers a free plan with a visual kanban-style pipeline that makes tracking candidates intuitive even for first-time recruiters. The drag-and-drop interface is its biggest draw, you can see exactly where every candidate stands at a glance, which is something Greenhouse's interface doesn't do as elegantly.
The free plan is limited to one active position and basic features. Paid plans starting at $157/month unlock multiple positions, automations, and team collaboration. Breezy HR works well for very small teams (under 20 employees) making occasional hires who want a clean, visual experience without complexity.
- Pricing: Bootstrap free forever (1 active role); Startup $157/mo on annual pricing on Breezy HR pricing, checked Oct 2026
- Best for: Very small teams that want a visual pipeline
- Key feature: Visual kanban pipeline and built-in video
- Limitation: Free plan caps at one active role
- Compare: Breezy HR comparison
#10 Recruitee, Best for Collaborative Hiring
Recruitee is designed around collaborative hiring, making it easy for hiring managers, interviewers, and recruiters to work together on candidate evaluation. Its team-based features, shared candidate notes, @mentions, evaluation templates, and hiring manager portals, are among the best in class for mid-market teams.
At $199/month, Recruitee targets companies with 50 to 500 employees where multiple stakeholders are involved in every hiring decision. The platform includes career site hosting, automated actions, and solid analytics. It's a good Greenhouse alternative for companies that value consensus-driven hiring.
- Pricing: Custom quote on Recruitee, checked Oct 2026
- Best for: Collaborative mid-market hiring teams
- Key feature: Hiring-manager collaboration surface
- Limitation: No free forever plan; Custom quote commercial terms
- Compare: Recruitee comparison
#11 Teamtailor, Best for Employer Branding
Teamtailor is the employer branding ATS. Its built-in career site builder is genuinely impressive, you can create a polished, branded careers page without touching code. If attracting talent through a strong employer brand is central to your strategy, Teamtailor makes that easier than any other ATS on this list.
The ATS functionality is solid (pipeline management, automations, team collaboration), and the platform includes employee testimonial features, department pages, and social sharing tools. Pricing is by request and typically involves annual contracts. Best for companies with 50 to 1,000 employees that invest heavily in employer branding.
- Pricing: Custom quote (annual contracts typical)
- Best for: Companies investing in employer branding
- Key feature: Built-in career site and brand tools
- Limitation: Opaque public pricing; often annual commitment
#12 Pinpoint, Best for Diversity-Focused Hiring
Pinpoint is a modern ATS targeting companies with 200 to 5,000 employees that prioritize diversity and inclusion in their hiring process. It includes blind screening options, diversity dashboards, and structured interviewing tools designed to reduce unconscious bias throughout the pipeline.
The platform also offers strong career site capabilities and multi-language support. Custom pricing means you will need to request a demo to get numbers, but Pinpoint typically sits between JazzHR and Greenhouse in cost. A solid choice for mid-market companies where DEI is a strategic priority.
- Pricing: Custom quote (demo required)
- Best for: Larger companies focused on DEI tooling
- Key feature: Diversity dashboards and structured screening options
- Limitation: Not built as a free forever starter ATS
#13 Dover, Best for AI-Powered Outbound Recruiting
Dover is an AI-first recruiting platform that automates outbound sourcing at scale. It builds candidate lists automatically, writes personalized outreach sequences, and manages responses, essentially acting as an automated recruiter for inbound and outbound hiring. Its Free ATS includes unlimited users and jobs; AI applicant scoring is on the $199/month Premium ATS plan (dover.com/pricing, as of October 2, 2026).
Dover is particularly strong for engineering and technical roles where passive candidate sourcing is essential. The AI learns from your hiring patterns and improves targeting over time. The limitation is that Dover is more of a sourcing automation tool than a full-featured ATS, you may still need a dedicated ATS alongside it for pipeline management.
- Pricing: Free ATS; Premium ATS $199/month on Dover pricing, checked Oct 2026. Marketplace recruiters set their own rates
- Best for: Startups that want free tracking plus optional marketplace hours
- Key feature: Free ATS plus recruiter marketplace
- Limitation: Marketplace hours are the paid motion; English-only resume parsing on Dover materials
- Compare: Dover comparison
#14 GoHire, Best for Multi-Channel Job Posting
GoHire is a straightforward ATS for SMBs that focuses on getting your job postings in front of as many candidates as possible. At $79/month, it provides multi-channel job distribution to 15+ job boards, a branded career page, and basic candidate management. A 15-day free trial lets you test before committing.
GoHire won't match the depth of Greenhouse or even mid-tier alternatives, but it does one thing well: simplifying the job posting and application collection process. If your main pain point is manually posting jobs across multiple platforms, GoHire solves that efficiently.
- Pricing: Custom quote on vendor materials
- Best for: SMBs focused on job distribution
- Key feature: Multi-channel job posting
- Limitation: Basic pipeline; limited AI screening
#15 SmartRecruiters, Best Enterprise Marketplace ATS
SmartRecruiters is a full enterprise talent acquisition suite with a marketplace of add-ons (assessments, background checks, job boards) that lets you customize your hiring stack. Targeting companies with 250+ employees, it competes directly with Greenhouse at the enterprise level but with a more modular approach.
The platform includes AI-powered candidate matching, CRM capabilities, and a strong mobile experience. Custom pricing means enterprise-level budgets are required. SmartRecruiters is not a startup play, it's for established companies looking for a Greenhouse-caliber ATS with more flexibility in vendor selection.
- Pricing: Custom quote (enterprise)
- Best for: Enterprises that want a hiring marketplace
- Key feature: Marketplace of hiring add-ons
- Limitation: Enterprise pricing; not a small-team free forever plan
#16 iCIMS, Best for Large Enterprise Talent Cloud
iCIMS is a full talent cloud platform serving 4,000+ customers including major enterprises. It covers the entire talent lifecycle, from career sites and recruitment marketing to ATS, onboarding, and internal mobility. If you're hiring hundreds of people per year across multiple regions, iCIMS has the infrastructure.
This is firmly enterprise territory. iCIMS requires significant implementation, training, and budget. For startups reading this list, iCIMS is almost certainly not the right fit, but for large organizations looking for a Greenhouse alternative with broader talent management capabilities, it's worth evaluating.
- Pricing: Custom quote (enterprise)
- Best for: Large organizations with complex talent ops
- Key feature: Broad talent-cloud platform
- Limitation: Enterprise-only complexity and implementation
#17 Freshteam (by Freshworks), Best Free ATS for Small Companies
Freshteam is Freshworks' HR and applicant tracking tool. When we rechecked pricing on October 2, 2026 we could not find a current Freshteam pricing page, so confirm with Freshworks that a free plan is still offered before you rely on it.
The ATS features on the free plan include job posting, candidate management, and basic pipeline tracking. It's not going to match Curriculo ATS's AI screening or Ashby's analytics, but for a small company that needs basic hiring tools without paying anything, Freshteam is a legitimate option, especially if you already use Freshworks products.
- Pricing: Custom quote; confirm live Free and paid tiers on Freshworks materials
- Best for: Small companies already using Freshworks
- Key feature: HR plus ATS in one Freshworks lane
- Limitation: ATS depth is basic relative to screening-first tools
#18 Hireology, Best for Industry-Specific Hiring
Hireology is a specialized ATS built for industries like healthcare, automotive, and hospitality, sectors where hiring is high-volume, location-based, and requires specific compliance workflows. Starting at $249/month, it's not cheap, but the industry-specific templates and integrations justify the cost for companies in these verticals.
Features include automated reference checks, pre-hire assessments, and integrations with industry-specific job boards. If you're a tech startup, Hireology is not for you. But if you're running a healthcare practice, auto dealership, or hospitality group and want a Greenhouse alternative tailored to your industry, it's worth a look.
- Pricing: Custom quote
- Best for: Industry-specific hiring such as healthcare, auto, hospitality
- Key feature: Industry workflows and compliance helpers
- Limitation: Not aimed at lean tech recruiting desks
#19 Recooty, Most Budget-Friendly ATS
Recooty is a bare-bones ATS from $79/month billed annually, with a 15-day free trial, that covers the essentials: job posting, candidate tracking, and a basic career page. If you need a cheap, functional ATS without any bells and whistles, Recooty delivers exactly that. The interface is simple, setup takes minutes, and it gets the job done for very basic hiring needs.
The trade-off is obvious, no AI features, limited reporting, no advanced automations. Recooty is the right choice only if your hiring volume is low (a few positions per quarter) and your budget is extremely tight. For anything more, Curriculo ATS's free plan offers significantly more value at no cost.
- Pricing: Custom quote
- Best for: Very budget-conscious small teams
- Key feature: Simple job posting and tracking
- Limitation: Basic feature set; limited AI
#20 OpenCATS, Best Open-Source ATS
OpenCATS is the only fully open-source ATS on this list. It's free forever, self-hosted, and gives you complete control over your data and customization. For technical teams that want to build a bespoke hiring workflow without vendor lock-in, OpenCATS is the starting point.
The reality: OpenCATS requires server setup, PHP/MySQL knowledge, and ongoing maintenance. The UI is dated, there are no AI features, and community support is the only help available. It's best suited for technically capable teams (often agencies or consultancies) that value ownership and customization over convenience. Most startups will find modern SaaS options like Curriculo ATS more practical.
- Pricing: Free open-source, self-hosted
- Best for: Technical teams that want full control
- Key feature: Open-source and self-hosted
- Limitation: Requires technical setup; dated UI; no hosted AI screening
How We Ranked These Alternatives
We evaluated all 20 Greenhouse alternatives across five criteria, weighted for startup relevance:
Startup relevance, Does the platform target and serve startups (5 to 500 employees) effectively, or is it built for enterprise?
Pricing accessibility, Is there a free plan or affordable entry point? Are there per-seat fees that scale unpredictably?
AI capabilities, Does the ATS offer meaningful AI features (screening, scoring, sourcing) beyond basic keyword matching?
Ease of setup, Can a hiring lead or hiring manager get started in minutes, or does it require weeks of implementation?
Free plan availability, Can you test the product with real hiring workflows before committing budget?
Platforms that scored highest across all five criteria ranked higher. Curriculo ATS ranked #1 on these criteria: a permanent free plan with AI candidate ranking, unlimited jobs and team members, and self-serve setup in about 15 minutes. Curriculo publishes this page; Ashby, Lever or Workable may suit you better if analytics depth, CRM or sourcing matter most.
FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
What's the best free alternative to Greenhouse?
Curriculo ATS's free Starter plan has unlimited jobs and team members and ranks up to 1,000 candidates with AI. Dover's Free ATS also has unlimited users and jobs, with AI scoring on its paid plan. Breezy HR and Zoho Recruit each allow one active job on their free plans. See the best free ATS comparison (checked October 2, 2026).
What is a strong Greenhouse alternative with AI screening?
Curriculo ATS Starter is free forever, and Pro is $50. Curriculo ATS scores every candidate from 0 to 100 against your job, with a written AI summary of the fit. Manatal Professional is $15/user/month billed annually on Manatal pricing, checked Oct 2026.
Can I migrate from Greenhouse to any of these?
Most modern ATS platforms accept candidate imports. Curriculo ATS has CSV and bulk resume imports for Greenhouse, Lever, Ashby and Workable exports, and most teams move their candidates in about 15 minutes. See the Greenhouse migration guide and the general ATS migration guide.
Which alternative is closest to Greenhouse in features?
Lever is the closest match with its CRM + structured hiring approach and DEI tools. Ashby matches Greenhouse in analytics depth with a more modern UI. For AI-powered screening specifically, Curriculo ATS offers the strongest capabilities with Impact Score ranking that goes beyond Greenhouse's keyword matching.
Do any alternatives have better AI than Greenhouse?
Yes, several. Curriculo ATS uses Impact Score ranking that evaluates measurable outcomes rather than keywords. Workable offers AI sourcing from a database of 200M+ candidate profiles. Manatal provides AI candidate matching with social media profile enrichment. All three deliver more advanced AI than Greenhouse's keyword matching approach.
How much cheaper is Curriculo than Greenhouse?
Greenhouse does not publish prices; Vendr reports that the median buyer pays $26,611 per year for Greenhouse (as of October 2, 2026). Curriculo costs $0 on the Starter plan or Pro is $50.
Combien coûte Greenhouse ATS ? (et les alternatives moins chères)
Greenhouse ne publie pas ses tarifs. Selon Vendr, l'acheteur médian paie 26 634 $ par an pour Greenhouse (Vendr, octobre 2026). Le devis dépend de l'effectif et du volume de recrutement.
C'est cher pour une bonne raison : Greenhouse a été conçu pour des sociétés cotées en bourse avec un service RH structuré. Le tarif par siège, la facturation annuelle d'avance et l'engagement de 12 mois minimum font partie du modèle. Si vous êtes une startup de 10 à 50 personnes qui recrute 5 à 20 postes par an, vous payez surtout pour des fonctionnalités que vous n'utiliserez jamais.
Trois alternatives Greenhouse moins chères en 2026
Curriculo ATS, 0 $ à vie (offres illimitées + 1 000 candidats). Idéal pour startups 1 à 50 personnes.
Workable, 189 $ / mois, essai 15 jours. Idéal pour PME 20 à 200 personnes.
Lever, environ 4 000 $ / an, aucun plan gratuit. Idéal pour scale-ups commerciaux.
Curriculo est le seul de la liste avec un vrai plan gratuit à vie, pas un essai. Vous publiez autant d'offres que vous voulez, l'IA classe vos candidats selon un Impact Score, et vous gardez vos 1 000 premiers candidats pour toujours. Pour une équipe qui recrute son premier ou deuxième employé, ça suffit largement.
Pourquoi Greenhouse coûte si cher
Trois choses gonflent la facture. D'abord la tarification par siège : chaque recruteur, chaque manager qui valide un candidat, chaque membre du comité d'embauche compte. Ensuite l'enterprise SSO, le reporting avancé et les intégrations Workday sont verrouillés derrière les paliers les plus chers. Et puis il y a les frais d'onboarding et de migration, souvent 2 000 à 5 000 $ ajoutés au contrat initial.
Si vous voulez juste poster une offre, trier les CV plus vite et embaucher, vous n'avez besoin d'aucun de ces trucs. Essayez Curriculo gratuitement, sans carte bancaire, des offres actives illimitées.
FAQ, Greenhouse ATS en français
Greenhouse ATS coûte combien par mois ?Greenhouse facture à l'année, pas au mois. Selon Vendr, le contrat médian est de 26 634 $ par an (octobre 2026). Le prix exact n'est communiqué qu'après un appel commercial. Quelle est la meilleure alternative gratuite à Greenhouse ?Curriculo ATS propose un plan gratuit à vie avec des offres actives illimitées et 1 000 candidats classés par IA. C'est la seule alternative sérieuse qui ne soit pas qu'un essai limité dans le temps. Greenhouse is strong for structured hiring, and this small sample points to slow loads and demo-to-reality gaps. We were lied to during our demo and told that Greenhouse could do things it could not. We have MAJOR buyers remorse. Needing to wait 10+ minutes for a candidate profile to load is unacceptable Workable is a capable recruiting and HR suite, and low-star reviews most often cite support delays and rising monthly cost. Account managers are useless and add no value. All escalations and requests are ignored. we're stuck with them for one more entire year. Breezy HR is strong on a free forever one-role plan, and low-star reviews most often cite support delays and reliability gaps. No applicants and account terminated with no warning. Tech Support is ABSOLUTELY USELESS. Individual opinions from low-star samples, not a verdict for every buyer.What users complain about (selected competitors)
Greenhouse
n=9, small sample
Capterra review, Feb 2025
Capterra review, Jul 2024Workable
n=42
Trustpilot review, Jan 2026
Trustpilot review, Dec 2025Breezy HR
n=38
Trustpilot review, Sep 2026
Trustpilot review, Jan 2026
Who should pick which alternative
You should shortlist Curriculo ATS when you want free forever Starter, Pro is $50, and scored shortlists without a Greenhouse Custom quote. Curriculo ATS scores every candidate from 0 to 100 against your job, with a written AI summary of the fit. Keep Ashby when analytics depth is the must-have. Keep Lever when CRM nurture is the must-have. Keep Workable when board distribution and a large sourced database matter more than ranking on free.
Pick Curriculo over Greenhouse when setup time and published price matter more than enterprise interview kits. Pick Greenhouse when structured hiring ops already justify a Custom quote.
Sources
- Greenhouse pricing, Custom quote, checked Oct 6, 2026
- Vendr Greenhouse marketplace, median contract context, checked Oct 2, 2026
- Curriculo pricing, checked Oct 6, 2026
- Breezy HR pricing, checked Oct 6, 2026
- Manatal pricing, checked Oct 6, 2026
- Best free ATS
- AI candidate ranking
Ready to try Curriculo ATS? Start free.